Monday, September 21, 2009

Some new names and an interesting legal opinion.

Today we find ourselves trying to decipher a cryptic email from one of our readers, the email didn't offer much other than three names that the writer suggested we investigate, they are:
  1. David Rodriguez, Esq.
  2. Monica Zuluaga
  3. Ana Ferrer
Now, don't get me wrong, I do appreciate the tip, but please next time someone decides to send us a tip, please be a little more detailed. Who ever sent me these names obviously knows the story behind them, save us a little grief and agravation and please send along whatever you know rather than have us figure out whatever your trying to tell us! Don't fear though, give us a little time and we'll figure out what's behind those names.

Moving along, today were going to look at the word Vendetta, lets see what the definition of that word is:

2 : an often prolonged series of retaliatory, vengeful, or hostile acts or exchange of such acts vendetta against those who opposed his nomination>

Now before we get carried away here, I know what you're thinking, I'm sure everyone thinks we have a vendetta against Detective Baluja, that is absolutely wrong. There is no vendetta behind the Straw Buyer, none at all, we have no axe to grind with Jorge. Regardless of the fact that Detective Baluja is a terrible cop who couldn't investigate his way out of a wet paper bag, he's not the culprit here, he's only a wheel in the machine. In fact the only objective of this blog is to FIND THE TRUTH, funny as it may seem that's the job of one of the other players in this story, yet he REFUSES TO SEE THE TRUTH that's put forth in our story. Sadly enough though, there is a member of the Bernardo Barrera mortgage fraud case who has a vendetta, we'll expose him a little later on.

Last Wednesday I mentioned a package of documents I received regarding the Barrera mortgage fraud case, I forwarded a copy of these documents to one of the attorneys that was working on the civil foreclosure case that resulted from the Oak Avenue home purchase. I asked this attorney to give me their opinion on Mr. Barrera's involvement based on the documents that I had sent him, his findings are as follows:

Wow, that's pretty interesting isn't it? Consider how damning the documents that we have are to cause someone to reach this conclusion. If indeed I am correct, then what kind of impact does complicity on the victims part have on the rest of the case? Even if there is no impact, doesn't it make the MDPD and the Assistant State Attorney look like asses? As I mentioned before, I still don't have the green light to post the documents that we received, while we're waiting though, we'll start learning the nuances of Mr. Barrera's handwriting.

Now onto something a little less serious! I caught glimpse of this car wash over the weekend:

All those wonderful scantily clad women WASHING HYBRIDS?! WHAT A FCUKING WASTE! Everyone knows that guys that drive those things have no interest in WOMEN!!!!!!

No comments:

Post a Comment